Thailand Data

Early Manual Switchboard Era (Late 1870s - Early 1900s): Very Short Numbers

1 to 3 Digits: When phone numbers were first introduced in 1879 (in Lowell, Massachusetts), they were very short, typically consisting of just one, two, or three digits. This was because they were primarily used as identifiers for a human operator to connect calls within a very small, localized exchange. For example, "Get me 342."
Limited Capacity: This system was only feasible for a small number of subscribers (a few hundred to a few thousand per exchange).
2. Early Automatic Switching Era (Early to Mid-1900s): Introduction of Exchange Names and 5-7 Digits

Introduction of Automatic Exchanges: With the invention of the Strowger automatic exchange in 1892, calls could be dialed directly without an operator. To enable this, phone numbers needed to be longer to uniquely identify subscribers within a growing service area.
Alphanumeric Exchange Names: Numbers evolved to include letters, often representing the name of the local telephone exchange. A common format became 2 letters + 5 numbers (e.g., "MUrray Hill 5-9975" or MU 5-9975). The letters corresponded to numbers on the rotary dial. This provided a 7-digit dialing number for local calls.
Reasons for 7 Digits (Local): This length was deemed sufficient for unique identification within large metropolitan areas and was manageable for callers to remember and dial using a rotary phone.
3. Direct Distance Dialing (DDD) Era (Mid-1900s onwards): Introduction of Area Codes and 10 Digits

Need for Long-Distance Automation: As telephone networks expanded and interconnected across cities and states, the need arose for direct dialing between distant locations without operator assistance.
Area Codes (3 Digits): To facilitate Direct Distance Dialing (DDD), the North American Numbering Plan (NANP) was introduced in 1947. This plan divided geographic regions into Numbering Plan Areas (NPAs), each assigned a unique three-digit area code. The first digit was typically not 0 or 1, and the second digit was always 0 or 1 (e.g., 212 for New York City).
10-Digit Standard: This meant that to dial a long-distance number, callers typically had to dial the 3-digit area code + the 7-digit local number, resulting in a 10-digit phone number.
Impact: This dramatically increased the numbering capacity and made direct long-distance calling practical, leading to an explosion in call volume and a reduction in costs.
4. The Era of Overlays and 10/11 Digit Dialing (Late 1990s - 2000s onwards): Addressing Number Exhaustion

Number Exhaustion: As populations grew and new services (fax machines, pagers, then mobile phones, and eventually VoIP) emerged, the original 7-digit local numbers within existing area codes began to be exhausted.
Overlay Area Codes: Instead of splitting existing area codes (which required number changes for many subscribers), new overlay area codes were introduced. This meant that a single geographic area could have multiple area codes.
Mandatory 10-Digit Local Dialing: The introduction of overlays romania phone number list often necessitated mandatory 10-digit dialing (Area Code + 7-digit local number) even for local calls within the same area code, to ensure unique routing.
11-Digit Dialing (with "1"): In the NANP, for some long-distance calls, callers still had to dial a "1" prefix before the 10-digit number, leading to an 11-digit dialing sequence (e.g., 1 + Area Code + 7-digit number).
5. Mobile Phone Numbers and Global Variations (Late 20th Century - Present): Variable Lengths and International Standards

Mobile Specific Ranges: Mobile phone numbers were introduced with their own dedicated ranges, often starting with specific prefixes (e.g., 017 for Grameenphone in Bangladesh). These numbers typically follow national numbering plans.
International Standards (E.164): For international calls, the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) established the E.164 standard, which specifies a maximum length of 15 digits for international phone numbers. This includes the country code. This standard ensures global interoperability.
Country-Specific Lengths: While E.164 sets a maximum, actual phone number lengths vary significantly by country, generally ranging from 8 to 14 digits for national (including trunk/area code if present) or mobile numbers. For instance, in Bangladesh, mobile numbers are typically 11 digits (e.g., 01XXXXXXXXX).
In summary, phone numbers have evolved from very short, operator-dependent identifiers to longer, standardized, multi-segment numbers driven by the demands of automated dialing, network expansion, and the sheer volume of subscribers globally, culminating in international standards to ensure seamless worldwide communication.
The length of phone numbers has significantly changed over time, primarily driven by the exponential growth in the number of telephone subscribers and the technological evolution from manual switchboards to automated, interconnected global networks.

Here's an overview of that evolution:

1. Early Manual Switchboard Era (Late 1870s - Early 1900s): Very Short Numbers

1 to 3 Digits: When phone numbers were first introduced in 1879 (in Lowell, Massachusetts), they were very short, typically consisting of just one, two, or three digits. This was because they were primarily used as identifiers for a human operator to connect calls within a very small, localized exchange. For example, "Get me 342."
Limited Capacity: This system was only feasible for a small number of subscribers (a few hundred to a few thousand per exchange).
2. Early Automatic Switching Era (Early to Mid-1900s): Introduction of Exchange Names and 5-7 Digits

Introduction of Automatic Exchanges: With the invention of the Strowger automatic exchange in 1892, calls could be dialed directly without an operator. To enable this, phone numbers needed to be longer to uniquely identify subscribers within a growing service area.
Alphanumeric Exchange Names: Numbers evolved to include letters, often representing the name of the local telephone exchange. A common format became 2 letters + 5 numbers (e.g., "MUrray Hill 5-9975" or MU 5-9975). The letters corresponded to numbers on the rotary dial. This provided a 7-digit dialing number for local calls.
Reasons for 7 Digits (Local): This length was deemed sufficient for unique identification within large metropolitan areas and was manageable for callers to remember and dial using a rotary phone.
3. Direct Distance Dialing (DDD) Era (Mid-1900s onwards): Introduction of Area Codes and 10 Digits

Need for Long-Distance Automation: As telephone networks expanded and interconnected across cities and states, the need arose for direct dialing between distant locations without operator assistance.
Area Codes (3 Digits): To facilitate Direct Distance Dialing (DDD), the North American Numbering Plan (NANP) was introduced in 1947. This plan divided geographic regions into Numbering Plan Areas (NPAs), each assigned a unique three-digit area code. The first digit was typically not 0 or 1, and the second digit was always 0 or 1 (e.g., 212 for New York City).
10-Digit Standard: This meant that to dial a long-distance number, callers typically had to dial the 3-digit area code + the 7-digit local number, resulting in a 10-digit phone number.
Impact: This dramatically increased the numbering capacity and made direct long-distance calling practical, leading to an explosion in call volume and a reduction in costs.
4. The Era of Overlays and 10/11 Digit Dialing (Late 1990s - 2000s onwards): Addressing Number Exhaustion

Number Exhaustion: As populations grew and new services (fax machines, pagers, then mobile phones, and eventually VoIP) emerged, the original 7-digit local numbers within existing area codes began to be exhausted.
Overlay Area Codes: Instead of splitting existing area codes (which required number changes for many subscribers), new overlay area codes were introduced. This meant that a single geographic area could have multiple area codes.
Mandatory 10-Digit Local Dialing: The introduction of overlays often necessitated mandatory 10-digit dialing (Area Code + 7-digit local number) even for local calls within the same area code, to ensure unique routing.
11-Digit Dialing (with "1"): In the NANP, for some long-distance calls, callers still had to dial a "1" prefix before the 10-digit number, leading to an 11-digit dialing sequence (e.g., 1 + Area Code + 7-digit number).
5. Mobile Phone Numbers and Global Variations (Late 20th Century - Present): Variable Lengths and International Standards

Mobile Specific Ranges: Mobile phone numbers were introduced with their own dedicated ranges, often starting with specific prefixes (e.g., 017 for Grameenphone in Bangladesh). These numbers typically follow national numbering plans.
International Standards (E.164): For international calls, the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) established the E.164 standard, which specifies a maximum length of 15 digits for international phone numbers. This includes the country code. This standard ensures global interoperability.
Country-Specific Lengths: While E.164 sets a maximum, actual phone number lengths vary significantly by country, generally ranging from 8 to 14 digits for national (including trunk/area code if present) or mobile numbers. For instance, in Bangladesh, mobile numbers are typically 11 digits (e.g., 01XXXXXXXXX).
In summary, phone numbers have evolved from very short, operator-dependent identifiers to longer, standardized, multi-segment numbers driven by the demands of automated dialing, network expansion, and the sheer volume of subscribers globally, culminating in international standards to ensure seamless worldwide communication.

Phone numbers have become a critical linchpin in our digital lives, serving not just as a communication channel but as a primary identifier and authentication factor for countless online services. This centrality, while convenient, also makes them a prime target for malicious actors seeking to gain unauthorized access to accounts, leading to devastating account takeovers.

Here's how phone numbers can be misused for account takeovers:

SIM Swap Fraud (Port-Out Scam/SIM Jacking): This is arguably the most prevalent and dangerous method. In a SIM swap attack, fraudsters trick a mobile carrier into transferring a victim's phone number to a new SIM card under the attacker's control.

How it happens: Attackers first gather personal information about the victim (e.g., name, address, date of birth) through phishing, social engineering, or data breaches. They then contact the victim's mobile carrier, impersonating the victim, and claim their phone was lost or damaged, requesting a number transfer to a new SIM they possess. Sometimes, inside help from a corrupt telecom employee or convincing the victim to approve a verification request is involved.
Impact: Once the number is ported, the victim's phone loses service. The attacker, now controlling the victim's phone number, can receive all calls and SMS messages, including crucial one-time passwords (OTPs) and two-factor authentication (2FA) codes that services send for login or password resets. This allows them to bypass security measures romania phone number list and gain access to bank accounts, email, social media, cryptocurrency wallets, and any other online service linked to that phone number.
SMS-Based Two-Factor Authentication (2FA) Bypass:

Many services rely on SMS as a second factor for authentication (e.g., sending a code to your phone). While better than no 2FA, SMS-based 2FA is vulnerable to SIM swap attacks. Once attackers control the phone number, they can intercept these codes and complete the login process, even if they don't know the primary password.
Social Engineering: Attackers might also use social engineering tactics (like vishing or smishing) to trick users into voluntarily providing 2FA codes sent to their phone numbers. They might pose as a bank representative or a tech support agent, creating a sense of urgency to persuade the victim to share the code.
Password Reset Vulnerabilities:

Most online services offer "forgot password" or "account recovery" options that often involve sending a password reset link or code to the user's registered email address or phone number.
If an attacker gains control of your phone number (via SIM swap) or tricks you into revealing a reset code sent to it, they can initiate a password reset on your accounts. By receiving the reset token, they can then set a new password and take over the account. This vulnerability is especially critical if the phone number is the only recovery option or if email recovery is also compromised.
Vishing (Voice Phishing) and Smishing (SMS Phishing):

Vishing: Attackers call victims pretending to be from legitimate organizations (banks, tech support, government agencies). They manipulate victims into revealing sensitive information, including phone numbers, account details, or even asking them to "verify" something by reading out a 2FA code that was secretly sent to the victim's phone by the attacker.
Smishing: Similar to vishing, but via SMS. Attackers send malicious text messages with links to fake login pages or prompts to call a fraudulent number. If a user clicks the link and enters their credentials, or calls the number and provides personal details, the attacker can use this information, including the phone number, to attempt account takeovers.
Data Breaches and Credential Stuffing:

While not directly using the phone number for the takeover, phone numbers are often part of large data breaches. Attackers compile lists of leaked credentials (usernames, emails, passwords, and phone numbers) from various breaches. They then use credential stuffing attacks, where automated tools try these stolen combinations across many other websites. If a user has reused their phone number for registration along with a compromised password, their account could be vulnerable. The phone number then helps the attacker identify accounts to target.
The pervasive integration of phone numbers into our digital security architecture means that protecting this single piece of information is paramount to safeguarding one's entire online identity.